Blog

Lets Play “Pretend To Lend” With Mortgages

pic from solent news agency/lets pretend mortgagesRecently I noticed the much vaunted return of Paragon mortgages back into the investor fold. For those who don’t know, these guys lent specifically to BTL investors, with a penchant for HMO mortgages.

So for a bit of entertainment, I thought I would hop over to their ‘new and improved” ;-) web site to see what the lending criteria was.

Basically it goes like this: maximum LTV 75%, ( although LTV’s are from 60% up) minimum of 4.3% interest rate ( nothing new so far) however, dig a little deeper and you also see this:


The Details:

  1. Affordability – “Gross rental income from the property should equal or exceed the individual product requirements, subject to an absolute minimum of 130% of an interest-only loan payment calculated at a rate of 7%” (Oh my, that’s painful!)
  2. Their ‘approved panel’ of solicitors must be used ( this is anti competitive at best!)
  3. Mortgage term – Minimum 5 years

Not only do they want a massive deposit, and a huge interest rate the most eye-watering of all that criteria is number 1. It reminds me of the phrase “how to loose the shirt off your back.” Combined, all these points really mean is that very few people will pass the test, or want to, especially if they have to be forced to keep a property for five years minimum. By the way, their rental criteria is pretty strict too.

Know What Life Holds For The Next 5 Years?

property mortgage trapIn property investing it’s hard to know what will happen to you within the next five years, and to be pinned down with no exit plan by a mortgage company is quite an exposed place to be for an investor. Of course there are those that will argue that a buy to let is a long term plan, which is very true, but that does not mean that you should not be able to exit it if need be?

Personal circumstances can change a lot in 5 years. (- I had a whole life change during a 5 year term, including moving countries, which I did could not have known would happen!)

This type of mortgage only really serves the lender. In effect what they are doing is talking the talk without walking the walk. Or to put it another way, they are covering their own backs only. Exit fees have been known to be as much as 5% of the loan in some cases. In the huge T&Cs list Paragon do state that the interest rate is variable. So another thing to watch out for is, if rates should rise, you would be paying the above rate PLUS the BOE base rate, which could be massive and wipe out profit, or at best make it a lot less profitable.

Don’t Leave Home Without Your Flak Jacket

In short, this mortgage will tie you down in every possible sense and leave you with absolutely no room to maneuver should things change either in the market or your own personal life. Paragon are just one of many mortgage companies who in my view are not offering real mortgage products.

The lending criteria is so strict that most people will not pass their set of rules. This is clearly mortgage companies paying lip service to lending whilst not actually risking much at all. make no mistake, the risks are firmly piled on the buyers shoulders and not the banks’.

A cynical person might think this is Paragon trying to recoup the loss on their shares after their exit from the buy to let market. Not me though ;-)

**UPDATE** Since I wrote this article banks have remained very tight with their lending forcing many people into bankruptcy and receivership. If you need help exiting bad loans read our commercial loans restructure page or contact us-we can probably help you.



LIKE THIS POST? THEN PLEASE SHARE IT WITH OTHERS!

Click Any Of The Buttons Below- or Click Above Right To Tweet It now!

Dont Be Shy! We Would Love Your Comments too-And We Always Respond.Thanks!
by CTA


  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Lets Play “Pretend To Lend” With Mortgages | My Property Mentor Blog -- Topsy.com

  • Lisa Orme

    Hello Roberta,

    I've been sent this blog post by a couple of people concerned about its contents and it is really quite misleading.

    1. Rental coverage – this is not excessive and I'm surprised that you don't advocate as much rental coverage as possible to ensure the deal is a good one and investors don't do bad deals that simply don't stack. Had more lenders insisted upon such coverage during the boom we may not have seen so many investors struggle to cover their mortgages.

    2. Minimum loan term – ALL lenders have a minimum loan term! This is the minimum over which you can have your mortgage not an enforced minimum. You don't HAVE to keep it for 5 years! If you take out a 2 year fix for example you can have a loan TERM of 5-25 years.

    What is significant which you didn't mention is that should you still be with them after five years you will need to switch from interest only to repayment. Again a sensible move but no one is forcing you to stay and I've no doubt they'll be quite happy to have their money back.

    3. Solicitors – ALL lenders have a solicitors panel. This simply means the solicitor you choose must be on their panel. It is not anti-competitive, it is standard practice and it is likely most solicitors will be on the panel.

    4. Deposits and rates – these are not excessive and are comparable to other products in the buy to let market.

    Paragon's re-entry into buy to let is a positive move bringing much needed competition to a far too sparse a marketplace and as investors we should be pleased.

    The fact that they will consider many deals that the current buy to let lenders won't is hugely significant and if an investor has one of those deals it's well worth jumping through a few hoops to get lending that they might otherwise struggle to get anywhere else except on commercial terms.

    Regards,

    Lisa Orme

    Mortgage Broker & Property Investor

  • http://www.ipinglobal.com/ IPINLive

    Great point, the mortgage industry is a fickle place at best – with a great deal hype on the product with no real thought for the long term for the client. The problem now appears to be spreading further to the first time buyer market now as well – companies offering 90% LTV into a market that they know will likely drop by that much in the first year,creating negative equity for the buyer.Whilst I won’t profess to have the answers, complicated lending is not one of them!

    • http://www.mypropertymentor.co.uk/ Roberta Ward

      In my view if banks are only offering the best deals to those with high equity or high deposit, this means they feel that market will drop by that much potentially. Banks always cover their own a** first! Thanks for commenting.

      **please note- we don’t allow external inks within the comments section**

Content Protected Using Blog Protector By: PcDrome.

Password Reset

Please enter your e-mail address. You will receive a new password via e-mail.