Blog

Average Price Comparables Are Pointless

zoopla logoWhat’s An Average House Price?

Yesterday i was having a sparring match on Twitter with the folks over at  Zoopla regarding some figures on their site which were re-quoted by CityWire financial web site.

We were in disagreement about my old favourite “Average House Prices”.  ( Yes, that old chestnut.)

They were stating that in a large percentage of the UK its now cheaper to buy than to rent.

The article quoted said this:

So where are the areas where it is more expensive to rent than to buy? According to Zoopla, which looked at asking prices and rental values of two bedroom flats, even in London, which has the highest rents in the country, buying is still the more cost-effective option. Average rents on two-bed flats are currently at £2,155 a month while average asking prices are an eye-watering £446,345. But mortgage repayments at 5%  are lower at £1,859 a month.

And this utterly meaningless statement :roll:

The cost of financing a 100% mortgage (though you can’t get one) on an £88,263 flat at 5% works out at only £367 – some £163 a month less than the average rent earned.

city wire logoLets look at the first part above. London prices for buying vary wildly from one borough to the next. As such there is no ‘average price’ in London. Sales figures were taken from all over London which is why the distorted figure of £446k comes out so high. If you remember back to school days :-P …. an average ( or- mean) figure is achieved at by adding all high and low together and dividing by the number of figures in the calculation.

A more accurate way of comparing would be a borough by borough price list. ( but that’s a lot of work- right?)

So if you have 20 house sales ranging from £2 million to £100,000 the average will come out somewhere in the middle of it all. But what’s the point of that? Its utterly nonsensical.

Now, on to the second part. The cost of financing a £100% mortgage! Followed up by “though you cant get one!”

This is LAZY journalism at it’s best. Why are they ( Citywire) even comparing figures on an unobtainable mortgage? Its plainly the most ridiculous statement I’ve ever read. The folks at CityWire should know better than to allow this tosh onto their site. This kind of writing and quoting in mass media is why vendors get so confused, because they are continually fed figures which are total tosh. ( And of course it’s on telly or in the newspaper so it must be right, huh?)

If they really wanted to compare this type of buying versus rental, then they should have used true mortgage/ rental costs with actual examples. Not some blanket statement of one size fits all.

Moral of the tale? take all indices with a large pinch of salt. At best they are only a vague guide and a bit of light amusement.


LIKE THIS POST? THEN PLEASE SHARE IT WITH OTHERS!

Click Any Of The Buttons Below- or Click Above Right To Tweet It now!

Dont Be Shy! We Would Love Your Comments too-And We Always Respond.Thanks!
by CTA


  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Average Price Comparables Are Pointless | My Property Mentor Blog -- Topsy.com

  • http://twitter.com/neilkurz Neil Kurz

    Completely agree with you Roberta! We have far too many price indices, many of which are misleading. We have averages being quoted that are of no relevant to the majority of the population living outside the M25. Its fairly disappointing that so much of the property media is geared around high-end property where cash purchases are common and mortgages are rarely a problem to obtain. Far better to have fewer, and more reliable, statistics than to have 15 different indices being issued through every conceivable media channel each month. The public aren't benefitting from receiving this fog of noise, they actually need safe, reliable data- and if that means (no pun intended) that they need re-educating about the mean, the median and the mode then so be it. Land Registry data is readily available now, so anyone relying, or even taking an interest in 'average' marketing prices from portals is quite mad. These typically contain/list many properties being marketed that will never sell as its simply the homeowner is 'flying a kite' on the price, and the stupid estate agent is allowing their marketing spend to go on the timewaster/s.

  • http://www.mypropertymentor.co.uk/ Roberta Ward

    Thanks for taking time to comment. One of the main problems also lies in who sets the indices in the first place. Many come from very large mortgage companies, or big estate agents, both have a distorted view of the market. As you say, there is no allowance made for cash sales or even investor off market sales. So the values really are very skewed and somewhat biased. Add to that the fact that we all should know by now that banks have been hanging on to repossessions for quite a while- which distorts the figures even further. Its all nonsense really.

Click To Follow Us On Twitter

Blogroll

Improve the web with Nofollow Reciprocity.
Content Protected Using Blog Protector By: PcDrome.

Password Reset

Please enter your e-mail address. You will receive a new password via e-mail.